Merge branch 'computorg:master' into master

Author: fradav

blog/2023-03-24-others-languages/index.qmd

@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 ---
-title: 'I use a different language than Python, R or Julia: would Computo accept my
-  contributions?'
+title: 'I use a different language than Python, R or Julia: would Computo accept my contributions?'
 date: '2023-03-24'
 description: Describe how to handle other languages than R, Julia or Python
 categories:
+- authors
 - reproducibility
 - code
 format:

blog/2023-06-21-data/index.qmd

@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 ---
 title: I have large or sensible data. How should I proceed?
 date: '2023-06-21'
-description: Describe how to handle large or sensible data files when submitting to
-  Computo
+description: Describe how to handle large or sensible data files when submitting to Computo
 categories:
+- authors
 - reproducibility
 format:
   html:

blog/2023-06-21-long-running-code/index.qmd

@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ title: My data analysis takes several hours/days/weeks... How to address the iss
 date: '2023-06-21'
 description: Discuss the reproducibility for long-running code
 categories:
+- authors
 - reproducibility
 format:
   html:

blog/2023-07-04-what-reproducibility/index.qmd

@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 ---
 title: What is expected exactly in terms of reproducibility?
 date: '2023-07-04'
-description: Discuss the different kinds of reproducibility at play in Computo, and
-  what is expected from the authors.
+description: Discuss the different kinds of reproducibility at play in Computo, and what is expected from the authors.
 categories:
+- authors
 - reproducibility
 format:
   html:

blog/2025-03-20-revised-github-process/index.qmd

@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ date: '2025-03-20'
 description: Describe how to render your article, activate your gh-page and publish
   your contribution online
 categories:
+- authors
 - reproducibility
 format:
   html:

blog/2025-07-22-openreview-process-overview/index.qmd

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+---
+title: 'OpenReview: how does the peer review of a Computo paper work?'
+date: '2025-07-22'
+description: Describe the review process using OpenReview
+categories:
+- authors
+- reviewers
+format:
+  html:
+    toc: true
+page-layout: article
+---
+
+Here is a step-by-step overview of the Computo reviewing process based on   [OpenReview](https://openreview.net/): 
+
+- **Submission**: the authors provide a link to git repository and HTML/PDF version of the manuscript
+- Editorial management: the editorial board decides whether the paper is appropriate for review
+- **Review** (typically 8 weeks): see our [Reviewer guidelines](/guidelines-reviewers)
+- **Rebuttal**: discussion and revision period (6 weeks, but extendable): 
+  -  discussion between authors and reviewers, upon which the reviewers will make their final recommendation.
+  -  if necessary the authors should update their submission
+- **Recommendation** by reviewers: accept/leaning accept/leaning reject/reject
+- **Official decision** by the editor: possible decisions are accept/minor revision/rejection (possibly with invitation to resubmit). There is no "major revision" option.