Skip to content

Requires qop-based authentication #3

@samizdatco

Description

@samizdatco

the module currently lacks backward compatibility with clients that don't provide ‘qop’ fields in the Authorize header. according to the RFC the server should work without it, but is it worth supporting the less secure version of an already not-bulletproof authentication scheme?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions