Type and signature augmentation of the Java standard library and other libraries #22845
                  
                    
                      vandmo
                    
                  
                
                  started this conversation in
                Feature Requests
              
            Replies: 2 comments
-
| IntelliJ has external annotations that carry some of this information: https://github.com/search?q=org%3AJetBrains+path%3Aannotations.xml&type=code&p=1 CheckerFramework also has something similar. | 
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
                  
                    0 replies
                  
                
            -
| I think something like additional JAR files containing only something like tasty files but only the the type/function signatures (not sure if that is actually supported in tasty). CheckerFramework seems like a good static analysis tool to be able to automate the creation of those files. | 
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
                  
                    0 replies
                  
                
            
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
        
    
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
A bit related to #7871 but I think the question warrants being discussed on a higher level.
Python has https://github.com/python/typeshed and TypeScript has https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped and both have made a huge impact.
Except for explicit nulls it seems like Caprese would benefit a lot of having information about which capabilities are needed for various functions in the Java API.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions