Skip to content

Conversation

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Fixes NB US 213-353 (C++26 CD).

Fixes cplusplus/nbballot#928

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the ballot-comment Response to an NB or ISO comment on a ballot label Oct 5, 2025
@jensmaurer jensmaurer added this to the C++26 milestone Oct 6, 2025
@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Oct 31, 2025

This is just moving paragraphs around in the same subclause, right? What about the suggestion from the comment issue to introduce more subclauses? Should we do both, or aim straight for that bigger change (maybe to be worked out next week)?

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. label Oct 31, 2025
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

Well, we can certainly try to add more subclauses, too.

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Oct 31, 2025

Mostly for the reasons I mentioned in the other issue: it can get rather confusing to have itemdecls/itemdescrs mixed with regular paragraphs, and it's usually cleaner if those appear in subclauses of their own.

But if there isn't an obvious and clear subdivision, we can also defer that or discuss later.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ballot-comment Response to an NB or ISO comment on a ballot decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants