Skip to content

Conversation

@mattkretz
Copy link
Member

This provides the proposed resolution to LWG4420, which then also resolves LWG4393.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added lwg Issue must be reviewed by LWG. not-editorial Issue is not deemed editorial; the editorial issue is kept open for tracking. labels Oct 21, 2025
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

jensmaurer commented Oct 21, 2025

This pull request has nothing to do with the current proposed resolution on the mentioned LWG issues.
Also, where did the "output_range" constraint go that would address LWG4393?
And please use the correct git commit title per https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/wiki/Commit-message-format .
And we probably have an overfull \hbox or so; the CI build is failing.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the changes requested Changes to the wording or approach have been requested and not yet applied. label Oct 21, 2025
@mattkretz
Copy link
Member Author

Sorry @jensmaurer, I did not expect a review as long as the PR is in draft status.
I just sent a big update to LWG4420 and wanted to point to a PR from it, which is why I opened it here. I'll fix the hboxes and commit message.

…atter) are incorrectly constrained for <stdfloat> types

Also fixes LWG4393, NB DE-288 (C++26 CD), NB DE-285 (C++26 CD).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changes requested Changes to the wording or approach have been requested and not yet applied. lwg Issue must be reviewed by LWG. not-editorial Issue is not deemed editorial; the editorial issue is kept open for tracking.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants