Skip to content

Conversation

@EzraBrooks
Copy link

I wanted to use existing assets to validate the implementation of the XSD, but the existing assets had data that was not valid URDF (i.e. gibberish type names like "type1"). This file doesn't seem referenced anywhere so I don't think making changes to it breaks anything.

Also, like in #227, I formatted it using Prettier to make it more legible.

I wanted to use existing assets to validate the implementation of the
XSD, but the existing assets had data that was not valid URDF (i.e.
gibberish type names like "type1").

Signed-off-by: Ezra Brooks <ezra@brooks.cx>
@EzraBrooks
Copy link
Author

My goal is to be able to add a test to this repository that validates the XSD implementation by checking against a known-valid URDF in CI. Right now (as evidenced by #229), we don't seem to have any automated validation of the schema.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant